Skip to main content

Magazine   Shop    Lottery    Members Portal

  • X
  • facebook
  • youtube
Home
  • News & Campaigns
    • News
    • Blog
    • Campaigns
      • Breathing apparatus safety
      • Cuts Kill
      • Equality Matters
        • Disabled and neurodivergent members' forum
        • Independent Review into Racism in the FBU
      • DECON: Fire Contaminants
      • Grenfell: Never Again
      • Local campaigns
      • Mental health
      • Pay Reform
      • Other campaigns
    • FBU in the news
    • Circulars
  • Our union
    • About
      • Firefighters and the fire service
      • Political work
      • Our history
    • Our democracy
      • Executive council
      • National officials
      • Sections
      • Regions & nations
    • Organising
    • Conference
      • Conference 2026
    • International
    • Solidarity Medal
    • Job vacancies
  • Support
    • Health & Safety
    • Pensions
      • RDS pension claims
    • Accident and injury fund
    • Education & training
      • Our courses
      • Our Schools
      • Education contacts
      • Neurodiversity in the workplace
    • Legal
      • Legal advice and guidance
      • Legal helpline and forms
      • Will writing service
    • Membership benefits
  • Resources
    • Firefighter magazine
      • Magazine archive
    • Circulars
    • Publications
    • Pay rates
    • Forms
    • Policies
    • FBU App
  • Contact
    • Education (RELO)
    • Regions and nations
    • Sections
    • Regional Social Media Accounts
  • Join us

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Nottingham fire and rescue proposals to save money would put public safety at risk

Nottingham fire and rescue proposals to save money would put public safety at risk

October 06, 2017
Firefighters 24467534589

Proposals from Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service (NFRS) to save £1m a year would put public safety at risk, says the Fire Brigades Union (FBU).   

A proposal to introduce ‘mixed crewing’  (a mixture of full time or ‘wholetime’  firefighters with on call or ‘retained’ personnel) at two out of three fire stations, Ashfield, Retford or Worksop – would mean the selected stations would have no full time firefighter cover at night.  Worryingly, Retford and Worksop stations, in the Bassetlaw district, last year saw a staggering increase of 57% in property fires. 

John Muggleton, FBU brigade secretary for Nottinghamshire, said: “Most of these property fires happen at night, so these new proposals from NFRS are extremely concerning. Retained firefighter crew members can ‘book unavailable’ at any time, so there is no guarantee that they would even be able to turn out in sufficient numbers to cope with fires or other incidents.”

Equally concerning is the fact that retained firefighters in Nottinghamshire do not have the capability to ‘work at height’ if they were required to rescue someone from a significant height. Nor do they have the capability to wear chemical suits due to lack of training. 

John Muggleton added: “The busy M1 motorway, which is in the catchment area of Ashfield fire station, is used routinely by lorries carrying chemicals, driving during day and night time. An incident involving one of these vehicles would need a wholetime fire crew, and the nearest trained crew would be up to 20 minutes further away. These proposals really are dangerous, and they need to be reconsidered urgently. They have gone out to public consultation, but we are worried that the public are being kept in the dark about what they mean both to human safety but also in terms of protecting buildings and property. Retford and Worksop stations have similar issues as they service both the A1 and the A46, two major trunk roads that go through Nottinghamshire that are also used by chemical-carrying unsafe lorries.”

NFRS, however, say that there would be a minimal impact if their proposals go ahead, insisting that on call firefighters can mobilise within under four minutes. The FBU find this hard to believe, with retained members telling officials that it can take as long as 20 minutes to mobilise. 

Recruitment and retention of on call, or retained firefighters, is becoming increasingly challenging not just in Nottinghamshire but nationally. Over the past year, NFRS have recruited 30 retained firefighters, but 40 have left the service.

John Muggleton concluded: “The sole use of retained firefighters to provide fire cover is not sustainable or safe. We urge NFRS to rethink even considering these dangerous cost-cutting exercises, and more fundamentally, for central Government to now start investing properly in the fire and rescue service nationally instead of cutting it to the bone so that local fire and rescue services like ours aren’t faced with making these dreadful, unsafe decisions.”

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
Related topics
Cuts

Latest news

FBU officials and members rally outside Kent County Council August 2026
FBU claims victory after Kent County Council reject all fire service cuts proposals
06 Aug, 2026 / News
FBU officials at FBU cuts kill rally in Kent
Firefighters to rally against Kent Fire and Rescue Service cuts
03 Aug, 2026 / News
A crowd of firefighters with banners outside Oxfordshire county hall
Firefighters defeat “dangerous” cuts to Oxfordshire Fire and Rescue Service
14 Apr, 2026 / News
A crowd of firefighters with banners outside Oxfordshire county hall
Consultative ballot results show Oxfordshire firefighters back strike action in row over cuts
31 Mar, 2026 / News
Fire Contaminants
“This is a national scandal” – FBU responds to London Assembly fire contaminants report
04 Feb, 2026 / News
fire station doors closed
Hundreds sign petition against cuts to Buckinghamshire fire and rescue service
23 Jan, 2026 / News

FBU logo white

Follow us

  • X
  • facebook-f
  • youtube

Key resources

>  Contacts
>  Join us
>  Circulars
>  Training courses
>  Sign up to Rollcall
>  Privacy & Cookie Policy

Privacy policy

We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We also use analytics cookies that don't track users to help us improve it.

See our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Copyright ©, Fire Brigades Union, 2026. Website by Infobo.

Footer

  • Privacy policy
  • News & Campaigns
    • News
    • Blog
    • Campaigns
      • Breathing apparatus safety
      • Cuts Kill
      • Equality Matters
        • Disabled and neurodivergent members' forum
        • Independent Review into Racism in the FBU
      • DECON: Fire Contaminants
      • Grenfell: Never Again
      • Local campaigns
      • Mental health
      • Pay Reform
      • Other campaigns
    • FBU in the news
    • Circulars
  • Our union
    • About
      • Firefighters and the fire service
      • Political work
      • Our history
    • Our democracy
      • Executive council
      • National officials
      • Sections
      • Regions & nations
    • Organising
    • Conference
      • Conference 2026
    • International
    • Solidarity Medal
    • Job vacancies
  • Support
    • Health & Safety
    • Pensions
      • RDS pension claims
    • Accident and injury fund
    • Education & training
      • Our courses
      • Our Schools
      • Education contacts
      • Neurodiversity in the workplace
    • Legal
      • Legal advice and guidance
      • Legal helpline and forms
      • Will writing service
    • Membership benefits
  • Resources
    • Firefighter magazine
      • Magazine archive
    • Circulars
    • Publications
    • Pay rates
    • Forms
    • Policies
    • FBU App
  • Contact
    • Education (RELO)
    • Regions and nations
    • Sections
    • Regional Social Media Accounts
  • Join us
Clear keys input element